FixVibe

// 探测 / 聚焦

GraphQL Depth Bombing & Batch Bypass

GraphQL's flexibility is also its vulnerability — depth bombs, alias batching, and field-suggestion leaks.

What it is

GraphQL's pitch is power for the client: ask for exactly the data you need, in any shape, in one round trip. The flip side is that 'in any shape' includes shapes the server didn't design for — recursive queries that fetch exponential data, alias batching that turns one HTTP request into a hundred logical operations, introspection that publishes the entire schema. Each of those features has a defensible motivation in the GraphQL spec; each is also a vulnerability vector when the server doesn't enforce limits. Modern GraphQL servers (Apollo Server 4+, Yoga, Hasura) ship reasonable defaults, but plenty of older deployments still ship with introspection on, no depth limit, and no per-alias rate limiting.

How it happens

GraphQL weaknesses appear when schema access, query cost, or resolver authorization is too permissive. Attackers can use the API's flexibility to discover data or stress expensive paths.

What an attacker gets

DoS via depth bomb is straightforward — server falls over from one expensive request, or from a small number of repeated ones. Auth rate-limit bypass via alias batching turns 'we limit logins to 5/min' into 'we limit batches of 100 logins to 5/min,' i.e., 500/min effective. Schema disclosure via introspection or field suggestions is mostly recon impact, but combined with authorization mistakes it becomes the recipe for surgical data extraction. In multi-tenant deployments, knowing the exact schema lets the attacker craft tenant-traversal queries.

// what fixvibe reports

What FixVibe reports

Runs in active scans of a domain you have verified you own, on Hobby and above. Each finding shows the affected URL or host, its severity and fix steps you can paste into your AI coding tool.

How to fix it

Set a max query depth — 8 or 10 levels is generous for legitimate use cases and tight enough to defeat exponential queries. Use libraries like `graphql-depth-limit`. Add complexity analysis (`graphql-cost-analysis`, `graphql-rate-limit`) that scores each query and rejects above a threshold — depth alone misses some cases. Disable field-suggestion responses in production (Apollo: `formatError` to strip suggestions; Yoga: maskedErrors plugin). Disable introspection in production (Apollo: `introspection: false` in config). Apply rate limiting per-alias, not per-request — each aliased login mutation should count as a separate operation against the limiter. Cap query body size at the HTTP layer — most legitimate queries fit in 8KB; a 1MB query is suspicious. For mutations, require an `Idempotency-Key` so the same operation can't be replayed in batches.

// 在你自己的應用上跑一遍

放心继續發布,FixVibe 持續幫你看守風险。

Verify you own the domain, then run active checks alongside the passive ones.

主動探測
138
本類别中触發的测試
模塊
58
專属 主動探測 检查
verified domains
130+
active checks after verification
Verify your domain →

// 最新检查 · 实用修複 · 安心發布

GraphQL Depth Bombing & Batch Bypass: what it is and how to fix it · FixVibe