FixVibe

// 探测 / 聚焦

Missing Rate Limiting

Without rate limits on auth endpoints, the attacker can credential-stuff at line speed.

概要

Rate limiting is the cheap defense most apps skip until it bites. The motivation is understandable — adding a Redis dependency, designing the limiter taxonomy, deciding on response codes, and testing the edge cases is real engineering work for a problem that hasn't bitten yet. Until it has. Then the incident postmortem reads: '4,200 successful credential-stuffing attempts before we noticed.' Modern credential dumps run into the billions of email/password pairs; even a 0.01% reuse rate against your service is hundreds of compromised accounts before lunch. The attacker has automation, distributed proxy networks, and patience. The defense has to be in place before they arrive — there's no graceful degradation when you're already on fire.

運作方式

Rate-limit weaknesses appear when sensitive workflows allow repeated attempts without enough throttling or friction. Attackers can use that gap for guessing, abuse, scraping, or cost-amplification.

影響范圍

Credential stuffing successes — every reuse-of-leaked-password account belongs to the attacker. Direct financial cost when endpoints trigger paid services (SMS via Twilio, email via Sendgrid, voice OTPs). Email-deliverability damage when password-reset spam triggers spam-trap entries. Resource exhaustion if the auth path is expensive (bcrypt with high cost factor, database lookups, external IdP calls). Reputation damage when 'hacked accounts at $service' shows up in support tickets.

// fixvibe 檢查的內容

FixVibe 檢查的內容

FixVibe checks this class with verified-domain active testing that is bounded, non-destructive, and evidence-driven. Public reports describe the affected surface and remediation. For check-specific questions about exact detection heuristics, active payload details, or source-code rule patterns, contact support@fixvibe.app.

铁壁防御

Add per-IP and per-account rate limits to every auth endpoint. The classic shape: 5 attempts per IP per 15 minutes for login; 3 password-reset requests per email per hour; 10 signups per IP per day. Use a distributed limiter (Redis, Upstash, Vercel KV) so multi-region apps share state. Layer per-credential locks: after N failed login attempts on the same email from any IP, require an emailed unlock link or step-up MFA before further attempts succeed. Add CAPTCHA challenges adaptively — first attempt is friction-free, third attempt requires a check, tenth attempt is locked out for an hour. Exponential backoff (each subsequent failure waits longer) is more graceful than hard cutoffs and harder to game with rotating proxies. As a defense-in-depth layer, monitor for suspicious request patterns at the WAF / CDN — Cloudflare's bot mitigation, AWS WAF rate-based rules, and similar can catch credential-stuffing campaigns by traffic shape before they hit your origin. For SMS-based endpoints, set hard per-day budgets — your bill should never be a surprise.

// 在你自己的應用上跑一遍

放心继續發布,FixVibe 持續幫你看守風险。

FixVibe 像攻击者一樣對你的應用公開面进行压力测試 —— 无代理、无安裝、无信用卡。我們持續研究新的漏洞模式,并把它們转化成实用检查和可直接用于 Cursor、Claude、Copilot 的修複方案。

主動探測
127
本類别中触發的测試
模塊
48
專属 主動探測 检查
每次扫描
487+
跨所有類别的测試
  • 免费 —— 无需信用卡,无需安裝,无需 Slack 通知
  • 只需粘贴 URL —— 我們爬取、探测、生成報告
  • 按严重程度分级,去重至只剩信號
  • AI-ready prompts where code applies, plus operator steps for DNS/provider fixes
運行免费扫描

// 最新检查 · 实用修複 · 安心發布

Missing Rate Limiting — 漏洞聚焦 | FixVibe · FixVibe