FixVibe

// sondagens / holofote

Missing Rate Limiting

Without rate limits on auth endpoints, the attacker can credential-stuff at line speed.

A pegada

Rate limiting is the cheap defense most apps skip until it bites. The motivation is understandable — adding a Redis dependency, designing the limiter taxonomy, deciding on response codes, and testing the edge cases is real engineering work for a problem that hasn't bitten yet. Until it has. Then the incident postmortem reads: '4,200 successful credential-stuffing attempts before we noticed.' Modern credential dumps run into the billions of email/password pairs; even a 0.01% reuse rate against your service is hundreds of compromised accounts before lunch. The attacker has automation, distributed proxy networks, and patience. The defense has to be in place before they arrive — there's no graceful degradation when you're already on fire.

Como funciona

Rate-limit weaknesses appear when sensitive workflows allow repeated attempts without enough throttling or friction. Attackers can use that gap for guessing, abuse, scraping, or cost-amplification.

O raio de impacto

Credential stuffing successes — every reuse-of-leaked-password account belongs to the attacker. Direct financial cost when endpoints trigger paid services (SMS via Twilio, email via Sendgrid, voice OTPs). Email-deliverability damage when password-reset spam triggers spam-trap entries. Resource exhaustion if the auth path is expensive (bcrypt with high cost factor, database lookups, external IdP calls). Reputation damage when 'hacked accounts at $service' shows up in support tickets.

// what fixvibe checks

What FixVibe checks

FixVibe checks this class with verified-domain active testing that is bounded, non-destructive, and evidence-driven. Public reports describe the affected surface and remediation. For check-specific questions about exact detection heuristics, active payload details, or source-code rule patterns, contact support@fixvibe.app.

Defesas blindadas

Add per-IP and per-account rate limits to every auth endpoint. The classic shape: 5 attempts per IP per 15 minutes for login; 3 password-reset requests per email per hour; 10 signups per IP per day. Use a distributed limiter (Redis, Upstash, Vercel KV) so multi-region apps share state. Layer per-credential locks: after N failed login attempts on the same email from any IP, require an emailed unlock link or step-up MFA before further attempts succeed. Add CAPTCHA challenges adaptively — first attempt is friction-free, third attempt requires a check, tenth attempt is locked out for an hour. Exponential backoff (each subsequent failure waits longer) is more graceful than hard cutoffs and harder to game with rotating proxies. As a defense-in-depth layer, monitor for suspicious request patterns at the WAF / CDN — Cloudflare's bot mitigation, AWS WAF rate-based rules, and similar can catch credential-stuffing campaigns by traffic shape before they hit your origin. For SMS-based endpoints, set hard per-day budgets — your bill should never be a surprise.

// rode no seu próprio app

Continue publicando enquanto o FixVibe vigia.

O FixVibe pressiona a superfície pública do seu app do jeito que um atacante faria — sem agente, sem instalação, sem cartão. Continuamos pesquisando novos padrões de vulnerabilidade e transformando isso em checks práticos e fixes prontos para Cursor, Claude e Copilot.

Probas activas
103
testes nessa categoria
módulos
27
checks dedicados de probas activas
todo scan
384+
testes em todas as categorias
  • Grátis — sem cartão, sem instalação, sem ping de Slack
  • Só colar uma URL — a gente crawla, sonda e reporta
  • Achados classificados por severidade, deduplicados no sinal
  • Prompts de fix atuais, prontos para colar no Cursor, Claude, Copilot
Rodar um scan grátis

// checks atuais · fixes práticos · publique com confiança

Missing Rate Limiting — Holofote de Vulnerabilidade | FixVibe · FixVibe